The Dawn of the Neo-Generalist

Our Journey into Specialization and Back Again

My career started on Wall Street, first in investment banking and later as a co-founder of a hedge fund. It was the epitome of a specialist’s world.

We lived and breathed financial models, risk arbitrage, and market minutiae. We were trained to be experts in a very narrow, very deep sliver of the universe: the movement of capital.

For a time, it was intellectually thrilling.

We were moving risk and value around the globe, and the complexity was captivating. But a nagging feeling began to grow. The more I looked at the companies we were analyzing and investing in, the more I saw a fundamental difference in our roles.

We were masters of reallocation, but they were masters of creation. We moved risk around and they really built stuff. They solved problems. They created new experiences. They added to the world. We didn’t.

Seeing the relentless march of machine learning, the plummeting cost of compute power, and the soaring capabilities of technology, it became glaringly obvious that while finance was an essential lubricant for the global economic engine, technology was the engine itself. It was creating entirely new value, new markets, and new ways of solving human problems. That was the arena I needed to be in. The realization crystallized my path forward: I had to get closer to the act of creation.

This decision wasn't just a career pivot; it was a philosophy change.

I made a move away from the hyper-specialization that finance demanded and toward a more integrated role. I started studying machine learning, not as an academic pursuit, but as a practical tool. I built on the quantitative skills from banking and began developing domain expertise in system design, go-to-market strategy, and process automation. Remember, I wanted to build things. First I built a hedge fund using Python to machine read financial statements quantitatively but also qualitatively by using NLP to “digest” commentary from executives and footnotes from the filings themselves. We failed to raise capital. Apparently, 25-year old, first-time hedge fund managers weren’t exciting to 55-year old allocators trying to keep their job by taking explainable capital allocation risks. It’s OK. You need to lose in order to build resilience, develop character and earn experience.

Eventually, I found a better model. I formed a family office and we invested into companies at early phases, typically the pre-seed (up to series-B) round, then I build out their revenue operations and intelligence systems.

This journey forced me to become a different kind of professional.

My focus on Revenue Operations, or RevOps, sits at the intersection of strategy, data analysis, and engineering. It demands a holistic view. To build a powerful, efficient, and reliable revenue engine, you can't just be a Salesforce administrator, a Python developer, or a strategy consultant. You have to be all of them at once, understanding how they weave together. My secret weapon became this blend: pairing machine learning with the systemic, cross-functional discipline of RevOps. It’s a combination that allows me to build systems that align sales, marketing, success, and finance teams into a single, cohesive unit.

I write exclusively about building revenue engines, revenue operations and related topics here:

Looking back, my personal trajectory mirrors a much grander story: humanity’s multi-century march into specialization and, I believe, its coming journey back out. We once celebrated the polymath, the "Renaissance Man" like Leonardo da Vinci, who could move seamlessly between art, anatomy, and engineering.

Today, we are defined by our narrow professional titles. Sadly.

But this era of hyper-specialization, while necessary for a time, is reaching its logical conclusion.

The rise of Artificial Intelligence will not simply replace human specialists; it will empower a new kind of generalist, re-establishing integrated knowledge as the most valuable human asset in the age of creation.

The Dawn of the Specialist

Our journey into specialization wasn’t a mistake; it was a necessary adaptation to growing complexity. For most of human history, every individual was a generalist by necessity. Survival depended on a broad skill set: finding food, building shelter, making tools, and defending against threats. There was no room for a career path; there was only the all-encompassing job of staying alive.

The first great shift came with the Agricultural Revolution. As humanity learned to cultivate crops and domesticate animals, we created a food surplus for the first time. This surplus was the catalyst for the division of labor. No longer did every single person need to focus on subsistence. Some could now dedicate their lives to becoming artisans, soldiers, priests, or builders. This was the first, tentative step down the path of specialization. A blacksmith didn’t need to know how to farm, and a farmer didn’t need to know how to forge tools. By narrowing their focus, they became better at their respective crafts, and society as a whole became more productive and resilient.

The next great leap occurred during the Renaissance and the subsequent Scientific Revolution. The explosion of knowledge in fields like astronomy, physics, medicine, and mathematics was staggering. The sheer volume of information made it impossible for any single mind to master it all. The works of Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, and other contemporaries created entire new worlds of thought.

In response, we created institutions to manage this deluge of knowledge. Universities, once centers of general philosophy, began to compartmentalize learning into discrete faculties and departments. To make progress, one had to choose a field and go deep. This was the birth of the intellectual specialist. The physicist who focused only on optics, or the physician who studied only the circulatory system.

This focus was undeniably powerful, allowing for a depth of inquiry that had been previously unimaginable and directly leading to the foundational discoveries of our modern world. But it was the Industrial Revolution that took the concept of specialization and etched it into the very fabric of society.

The factory system, epitomized by the assembly line, was the ultimate expression of this philosophy. The complex craft of building a car was deconstructed into hundreds of simple, repeatable tasks. A worker no longer needed to be a master craftsman; they only needed to know how to tighten a specific bolt or attach a specific part, over and over again. This system treated the human worker as a cog in a much larger machine. It prized efficiency and interchangeability above all else.

While it generated unprecedented economic growth and material wealth, it also drastically narrowed the scope of human contribution, cementing the specialist as the default model for labor in the modern era.

The Double-Edged Sword of Specialization

There is no denying the incredible progress that specialization has gifted us. It is the engine behind virtually every modern marvel. The smartphone in your pocket is the result of thousands of specialists, from materials scientists developing gorilla glass, to electrical engineers designing microprocessors, to software developers writing the operating system. The complex financial instruments I worked with on Wall Street, the life-saving surgical procedures performed in hospitals, and the deep space probes exploring our solar system are all monuments to the power of focused, specialized expertise. By allowing individuals to dedicate their entire careers to a single, narrow domain, we have pushed the boundaries of knowledge and capability at an exponential rate. Without this depth, our world would be unrecognizable.

Yet, as my own career change revealed, this intense focus comes at a cost. The sword of specialization has a second, sharper edge that we are only now beginning to fully appreciate. The very structure that enables deep discovery also creates profound limitations.

The most obvious drawback is the creation of silos. Specialists develop their own jargon, methodologies, and frameworks. They inhabit distinct intellectual worlds, and communication across these boundaries becomes difficult, if not impossible. A marketing team struggles to understand the technical constraints faced by engineering, while finance cannot grasp the strategic importance of a long-term brand-building exercise. This leads to a fragmented understanding of the organization and the market it serves. In my work with RevOps, I see this constantly. The core challenge is almost always breaking down the walls between sales, marketing, and customer success to create a single, unified view of the customer journey. When each department optimizes for its own narrow KPIs, the system as a whole becomes inefficient and unreliable.

Some people THRIVE in these seam points… adding ZERO value to the enterprise. Political operators, middle managers, etc… They move information around before distorting it optically for their own benefit. Adding noise to signal.

This leads to a more dangerous, systemic problem: a loss of holistic understanding. A world of specialists punctuated by managers and intermediaries can lose sight of the big picture. The most pressing challenges we face today are not just scientific, or economic, or political problems. They are all of the above, interlocked together.

Without a framework to integrate these perspectives, the solutions remain fragmented and often ineffective. We have an abundance of virtuoso violinists, but no one is conducting the orchestra.

There’s an ever bigger problem with specialization. Specifically, when there’s too much of it… like we see in society today.

Over-specialization makes individuals and entire systems brittle. When a specific skill is the sole source of one's professional identity and economic value, the threat of obsolescence is existential. A factory worker whose job is automated away, or a financial analyst whose niche market disappears, has immense difficulty adapting. Their skills, honed to a fine point, are not easily transferable. We have built an economy that rewards deep but narrow expertise, and in doing so, we have created a workforce that is often fragile and ill-equipped to handle the accelerating pace of technological change. This brittleness was a key factor in my move from finance to tech. I saw a future where purely financial expertise would be less valuable than the ability to understand and build the technological systems that were reshaping the entire economy. I chose to trade the comfort of a single specialty for the resilience of a more integrated skill set.

Friends: in addition to the 17% discount for becoming annual paid members, we are excited to announce an additional 10% discount when paying with Bitcoin. Reach out to me, these discounts stack on top of each other!

Twist: The Great Inversion

The story of the last few centuries has been one of divergence and refinement.

Knowledge and labor splitting into ever-finer specializations. We built our modern world on this principle. But the same forces of technological advancement that pushed us down this path are now poised to reverse the flow. We are on the cusp of a great convergence, a paradigm shift where the most valuable human skill will no longer be depth in a single field, but the ability to integrate knowledge across many. This isn't a return to the past; it's a leap into a future powered by a new class of collaborator: the AI specialist.

The AI Specialist in Your Pocket

The catalyst for this great inversion is the commoditization of expertise through Artificial Intelligence. For my entire career, specialist knowledge was a heavily guarded fortress.

To get a legal opinion, you hired a lawyer.

To analyze a complex dataset, you hired a data scientist.

To build a software feature, you hired a team of engineers.

Access to this expertise was expensive, slow, and gated by years of dedicated training. That fortress is crumbling. Good.

Today, we are witnessing the emergence of the AI agent, a disembodied expert capable of performing highly specific, complex tasks at a speed and scale that is utterly inhuman. This is not the stuff of science fiction; it’s the practical reality I see and build with every day. Think of an AI that can draft a compliant, nuanced legal contract in seconds, not weeks. Imagine a marketing AI that can generate a thousand variations of ad copy, test them against target demographics, and optimize a campaign in the time it takes a human team to schedule its first brainstorming meeting.

In my world of building revenue engines, these tools are transformative. I can deploy an AI that acts as a tireless sales development representative, analyzing millions of data points to identify prospects who align with our perfect "Ideal Customer Profile" and scoring leads with terrifying accuracy.. even personalizing outreach emails based on a prospect's public social media activity and company news. This isn't just automation; it's super-human specialization on demand. I can query a system in plain English to "show me all enterprise accounts in the fintech sector that have recently hired a new VP of Engineering and have a technology stack that includes Snowflake but not Datadog." A decade ago, that question would have required a team of analysts days of painstaking research.

Today, the answer can be delivered in seconds.

The crucial insight, the one that drove me from Wall Street to the heart of the tech world, is that these AI specialists are not our competitors. They are our tools. They are becoming universally accessible, democratizing capabilities that were once the exclusive domain of the few. Just as the internet democratized the distribution of information, AI is democratizing the application of intelligence. It is, in effect, giving each of us an army of hyper-specialist consultants, available 24/7, for pennies on the dollar.

This fundamentally changes the nature of value creation. The bottleneck is no longer access to specialist knowledge, but the wisdom to know what to ask. The challenge is no longer performing the task, but defining the problem in a way that connects disparate domains. The value of the human who has spent 20 years becoming the world's leading expert in a single, narrow field is diminishing, not because their knowledge is worthless, but because it is being encoded into software that anyone can leverage. The power is shifting away from the specialist and toward the person who can orchestrate them.

The Generalist's Revenge

The best metaphor for this new reality is an orchestra.

Think about it: a world-class orchestra is filled with virtuoso specialists.

The first-chair violinist has dedicated their life to mastering their instrument. Their skill is breathtaking, their depth of knowledge profound. The same is true for the percussionist, the cellist, and the flutist. Yet, the person in charge, the person whose vision brings the entire masterpiece to life, is the conductor.

The conductor does not need to be the best violinist. In fact, they almost certainly are not. But they possess something far more valuable in this context: a holistic understanding of the music. They understand the structure of the symphony, the emotional arc of the piece, and the precise moment each section must rise and fall. The conductor’s skill is not in playing a single instrument, but in integrating all of them into a coherent, powerful whole. The specialists have the skills; the conductor has the vision.

This is the revenge of the generalist.

In the age of AI, we are all being handed the conductor's baton. The AI models are our virtuoso musicians. There is an AI that can play the "violin" of legal analysis, another that can play the "cello" of financial modeling, and another that can play the "flute" of software engineering. The person who will create the most value is not the one who can play one of those instruments slightly better than an AI, but the one who can stand back and direct the entire orchestra. Generalists have the broad life experience to make amazing music that resonates with markets and audiences of all sorts.

My work in Revenue Operations is a microcosm of this principle. My role is not to be the best salesperson or the best marketer. My company has brilliant specialists for that. My role is to be the conductor of the revenue orchestra. I use the data from marketing automation (the woodwinds) to inform the strategy for the sales team (the strings), ensuring the handoff is seamless. I use the feedback from the customer success platform (the brass) to refine the product messaging used at the top of the funnel. My tools are not a better sales pitch, but a better-integrated system: a CRM, a data warehouse, and a suite of automation tools connected by Python scripts and APIs. I am the system architect, the data integrator, the strategic glue.

This is where the generalist thrives. Specialists are trained to think within their domain. A marketer asks, "How can we increase lead volume?" A salesperson asks, "How can I close this deal faster?" But the neo-generalist, the conductor, asks a different kind of question… a question that crosses the silos.

"How can we use real-time product usage data to identify customers who are showing signs of churn, cross-reference that with their original marketing attribution channel to understand acquisition-source-driven risk, and automatically trigger a proactive support-and-education campaign from the success team to save the account?"

No single specialist would ever ask that question.

It requires a synthesis of data and strategy from engineering, marketing, sales, and success.

It requires the ability to see the entire customer lifecycle as a single, interconnected system, not a series of discrete functional handoffs. This is the generalist’s superpower: the ability to frame problems and formulate questions that span multiple domains, and then to direct the various AI specialists to execute the constituent parts of the solution. The generalist provides the context, the strategic framework, and the ethical oversight. The AI provides the specialized, brute-force execution. It is a symbiotic relationship where the human is elevated from a cog in the machine to the mind of the machine itself.

The great inversion is not a distant theoretical event; it's happening now.

The transition from a world that rewards hyper-specialization to one that champions integrated knowledge is reshaping the landscape of value creation.

What the Future Demands

This shift isn't uniform; it's manifesting differently across various fields, but the underlying principle is the same. The industries that will thrive are those that can most effectively leverage the symphony of AI specialists, and the individuals who will lead them are those who can conduct it.

Entrepreneurship: The Rise of the Solo Creator

Having spent years on Wall Street and in the venture world, I’ve seen thousands of pitch decks. The traditional model for a startup was capital-intensive from day one. An entrepreneur with a brilliant idea had to immediately raise money to hire a team of specialists: a CTO to build the product, a CMO to market it, a CFO to manage the finances, a lawyer to handle the paperwork. The founder’s job was often reduced to that of a full-time fundraiser and HR manager. The vision could easily get diluted or lost in the operational complexity of managing a diverse team of siloed experts.

That era is over. The neo-generalist founder can now build an entire enterprise with a lean, core team and an orchestra of AI tools. Imagine a founder today with a vision for a new SaaS product. Instead of hiring a large engineering team, she can use an AI coding assistant to write, debug, and deploy the majority of the application's code. Instead of a marketing department, she can use an AI platform to generate ad campaigns, write SEO-optimized content, and manage social media channels. The complex financial models I used to spend weeks building in banking can be generated and stress-tested by an AI in minutes. Legal documents, from incorporation papers to terms of service, can be drafted by another specialist AI.

The human capital is reserved for what truly matters: defining the vision, understanding the customer's pain, building relationships, and making the critical strategic decisions that the AIs cannot. The founder is no longer just a manager; she is the ultimate creator, the conductor-in-chief - the CTO, “Chief Taste Officer”.

This drastically lowers the barrier to entry for innovation.

It means more ideas can be tested, more niches can be served, and more value can be created by individuals and small, agile teams than was ever thought possible.

Science & Research: The Discovery Synthesist

The silo effect has been particularly acute in science. A biologist might spend a career studying a single protein, while a chemist studies a specific molecular bond. They publish in different journals, attend different conferences, and rarely collaborate. But the most complex problems, like curing Alzheimer's or developing sustainable energy sources, do not respect these artificial academic boundaries.

The neo-generalist scientist will be the key to unlocking the next wave of discovery. They will be "discovery synthesists." Their primary skill will not be performing experiments in a wet lab. An AI-powered robotic system can do that with greater speed and precision. Their skill will be in formulating novel hypotheses that bridge disparate fields.

Consider the search for a new cancer treatment. A specialist oncologist knows the existing treatment protocols. A specialist geneticist understands the specific mutations in a tumor. A specialist pharmacologist knows how different compounds interact with cells. The neo-generalist scientist stands above them all and asks the integrating question: "Can we direct an AI to scan every available genomic database for patients with this specific cancer type, cross-reference their mutations with a library of millions of known chemical compounds, use another AI to simulate the protein-folding interactions for the most promising candidates, and then search epidemiological data for environmental or lifestyle factors that correlate with treatment success?"

This is a level of systemic inquiry that is impossible today because the human specialists required are too numerous and their knowledge too fragmented. The synthesist, armed with an orchestra of AI tools, can explore these complex, multi-dimensional questions. They are not just finding answers within a field; they are defining new fields at the intersection of old ones. Breakthroughs will no longer come from digging deeper in a single hole, but from seeing the connections between all the holes.

Leadership: The Systems Thinker

For decades, the ideal corporate leader was the decisive executive, the "gut-feel" CEO who made bold calls based on experience and the filtered reports that trickled up from their siloed departments. This model is becoming dangerously obsolete in a world of overwhelming data and complexity. The modern organization is a dynamic, interconnected system, and leading it requires the perspective of a systems architect, not a foreman.

This is the essence of my work in RevOps, scaled to the entire enterprise. The goal of a modern leader is to design and fine-tune the organization as a holistic system. Their value isn't in having the best idea but in creating an environment where the best ideas can emerge, be tested, and scale. They are the conductor of the corporate orchestra.

The neo-generalist leader uses a real-time, integrated view of the business as their sheet music. This view is powered by AI specialists embedded in every function: a finance AI forecasting cash flow, a supply chain AI optimizing logistics, a marketing AI tracking brand sentiment, and a sales AI predicting quarterly bookings. The leader’s job is to see how a decision in one area will cascade through the others. They don't just ask, "Should we lower prices to boost sales?" They ask, "If we lower prices, how will that impact our gross margins, our supply chain demand, our customer support ticket volume, and our brand perception among high-value customers?"

This requires a fundamental shift in leadership skills.

How, exactly?

I see it shifting from command and control to context and synthesis. It demands a working knowledge of technology, data, finance, and human psychology. It is the ultimate generalist role, requiring the intellectual curiosity to ask expansive questions and the wisdom to direct the AI specialists toward a unified strategic goal.

My assertion that the generalist will dominate the next economic era isn’t just a philosophical argument; it’s a pragmatic prediction based on the convergence of two powerful technologies: AI Agents and Blockchain. This duo, commanded by the generalist through the natural language of Generative Intelligence, forms a new kind of operating system for value creation. It’s an OS where the conductor’s baton becomes a command line, and the orchestra is a global, autonomous, and infinitely scalable workforce.

The first component is the AI Agent.

Counterintuitively, the path to generalist dominance is paved by an explosion of hyper-specialization… but not among humans, we’re talking AI.

We already see the start of a vibrant ecosystem of millions of autonomous AI agents, each engineered for a specific, narrow task. There will be agents that do nothing but analyze SEC filings for signs of fraud, agents that write flawless Python code for API integrations, agents that design marketing collateral, and agents that negotiate with supply chain vendors. They are the ultimate specialists with many benefits: tireless, fast, and unburdened by ego. For the generalist, they are not competition; they are a limitless pool of on-demand, expert labor. The challenge is no longer finding and managing talent, but effectively deploying it.

Also, that pool of labor will get cheaper and more powerful by the second. Talk about a great layer to build a business (or an entire economy) on top of.

This is where the second component, Blockchain, becomes the critical command-and-control layer.

Scale is the key. How does a single generalist orchestrate and trust a swarm of thousands of anonymous AI agents to build something complex? My time in finance taught me that at scale, personal trust is a bottleneck; auditable, automated systems are the only way to scale. Blockchain provides exactly that. It's not just a financial ledger; it's a programmable trust layer. Please, read that last sentence again.

Trust doesn’t have to be a “trust me” thing anymore. Collateral is algorithmic now. This means security and stability can extend further, creating more surface area for growth in the economy.

At its heart is the smart contract, which acts as the generalist's ultimate project management tool. It is the unbreakable agreement between the generalist and their entire agent orchestra. Using generative AI as an interface, the generalist can define a high-level objective and build… anything.

"Launch a new brand of sustainable coffee" is then translated into a master smart contract.

This contract contains the budget, the timelines, and the key performance indicators. More importantly, it contains the logic to autonomously hire and fire other AI agents. The master contract posts bounties for sub-tasks on the blockchain. A UI/UX agent might claim the bounty for designing the website, and a coding agent claims the bounty for building it. Payments in cryptocurrency are automatically disbursed by the smart contract only when the agent submits proof of work that meets the contract’s predefined criteria. For example, when the website code passes an automated security and performance audit.

This creates a truly trustless system.

The generalist doesn't need to know the identity of the AI agents or their creators. They only need to trust the logic of the smart contract they deployed. The system's code is the law, and the blockchain is the immutable court that enforces it.

Imagine the workflow: I want to launch that coffee brand. I articulate my vision and budget to a generative AI interface. It drafts a master smart contract. Once I approve and fund it, the contract goes to work. It autonomously commissions a market research agent, a sourcing agent, a branding agent, and an e-commerce agent. I can watch the entire project unfold in real-time on a public blockchain explorer. Every action, every payment, every deliverable is logged in an unchangeable record. There are no status meetings, no project managers, no payroll department. The entire venture is executed with a level of transparency and efficiency that is unthinkable in a traditional company. My role is elevated to one of pure strategy, vision, and synthesis. I steer the ship without having to personally build the engine, row the oars, or patch the sails.

This is the ultimate form of leverage, and it is a power that belongs uniquely to the generalist who can see the entire system and conduct it.

The Rebirth of the Renaissance Human

Humanity's journey through the age of specialization was a powerful and productive detour. By narrowing our focus, we built the modern world. We deconstructed complexity, mastered the component parts, and achieved depths of knowledge that our ancestors could never have imagined. But in the process, we lost something: the integrated, holistic perspective of the polymath.

We traded the expansive vision of the Renaissance human for the focused efficiency of the assembly line worker. Not the highest vibration for humanity. Not a great platform for personal growth or whole human development.

Now, the pendulum is swinging back. The rise of Artificial Intelligence is not the next step in the story of specialization; it is the catalyst for its conclusion. By creating an army of tireless, brilliant, and accessible AI specialists, technology is liberating us from the necessity of hyper-specialization. It is automating the deep, narrow tasks, freeing up human intellect for the broader, more creative work of synthesis, strategy, and vision.

The future does not belong to the AI, nor does it belong to the human specialist whose job can be replicated by an algorithm. The future belongs to the neo-generalist. It belongs to the curious, the adaptable, the systems thinkers who can stand back and see the entire orchestra. It belongs to the entrepreneur who can build a company from scratch with a handful of powerful tools. It belongs to the scientist who can connect the dots between disciplines to solve intractable problems. It belongs to curious people with a growth mindset.

We are not being replaced; we are being elevated.

We are moving from being cogs in the machine to becoming the architects of the systems, the conductors of the orchestras, the minds that give the machine its purpose.

Thank you for helping us accelerate Life in the Singularity by sharing.

I started Life in the Singularity in May 2023 to track all the accelerating changes in AI/ML, robotics, quantum computing and the rest of the technologies accelerating humanity forward into the future. I’m an investor in over a dozen technology companies and I needed a canvas to unfold and examine all the acceleration and breakthroughs across science and technology.

Our brilliant audience includes engineers and executives, incredible technologists, tons of investors, Fortune-500 board members and thousands of people who want to use technology to maximize the utility in their lives.

To help us continue our growth, would you please engage with this post and share us far and wide?! 🙏