Monolithic Architecture Dominance in the Age of AI

For ten years, you have been sold a lie. You were told that fragmentation was a virtue. You were told that decoupling your logic into tiny, isolated boxes was the only way to scale.

You were told that the Monolith was a dinosaur. A relic of a bygone age, destined for extinction.

They were wrong.

While you were busy slicing your application into nanoservices, maintaining twelve different CI/CD pipelines, and debugging race conditions across network boundaries, the titans of industry… you know, Google, Meta, the true heavyweights, they were doing the opposite.

They were consolidating. They were building Fortresses.

And now, a new variable has entered the battlefield. A variable that changes the physics of software engineering entirely.

Artificial Intelligence.

The AI does not want fragmentation. It craves context. It does not want boundaries. It wants total visibility.

The pendulum is swinging back with violent force. The future of high-performance engineering is not distributed chaos. It is the Unified Structure. It is the Monorepo.

It is the Return of the Monolith.

And I am so here for it, because microservices suck.

The Fragmentation Fallacy

Let us define the enemy. The enemy is Complexity. But not just any complexity. Accidental Complexity.

We must look at the history of this war to understand how we lost our way. In the early 2010s, the “cloud” became ubiquitous. Suddenly, spinning up a server cost pennies. The architects looked at their massive, sluggish codebases and felt fear.

They feared the “Merge Conflict.”

They feared the “Deploy Queue.”

They feared the coupling that made a change in the billing module crash the user profile page.

So, they adopted something of a scorched-earth policy: Microservices.

The logic seemed sound. Divide and conquer. Give every squad a small repository. Let them pick their language. Let them deploy independently. It sounded like freedom.

But it was a trap.

The Network

When you move from a Monolith to Microservices, you are trading reliable, nanosecond-speed function calls (in-memory) for unreliable, millisecond-speed network calls (over the wire).

You are replacing Physics with Logistics.

This is never a good idea, and yet, you can’t discuss the crude idea of a monorepo in polite conversation with 99% of techies.

The groupthink is strong in tech. Sigh. Back to the nerdy fun stuff.

In a Monolith, if Component A needs data from Component B, it reads a memory address. It is instant. It is deterministic. In a Microservice architecture, Component A must:

1. Serialize the request.

2. Open a socket.

3. Traverse the network.

4. Hit a load balancer.

5. Enter Component B.

6. Deserialize.

7. Process.

8. Serialize the response.

9. Traverse the network back.

This is not “scaling.” This is friction. This is heat loss. This is burning capital on latency.

The Distributed Monolith

The tragedy is that most teams never achieved true decoupling. They built the Distributed Monolith.

This is the worst of all possible worlds. You have all the coupling of a monolith. That sucks. Imagine if Service A changes its API, Service B breaks… but you have none of the tooling to detect it. You cannot compile the system to check for errors. You cannot run a single integration test suite.

You are flying blind.

When your system goes down, you are not debugging code. You are debugging something much worse: network topology. You are hunting ghosts in a distributed trace, burning hours trying to find which of your 40 “decoupled” services decided to timeout.

This is not engineering. This is archaeology.

Part II: The Physics of the Monorepo

We must strip away the buzzwords and look at the mechanics. A Monorepo is not necessarily a Monolith application, but they are spiritually aligned. A Monorepo is a single repository that houses the code for many projects, libraries, and services.

Why is this superior? Because it aligns with the fundamental law of high-agency engineering: Colocation of Context.

You need to view your codebase not as a collection of text files, but as a Supply Chain.

Dependency Management

In the Polyrepo (multi-repo) world, code sharing is a logistical nightmare.

Let’s say you have a shared library, Auth-Lib.

You find a critical security bug in Auth-Lib. Darn.

The Polyrepo Fix:

1. Fix the bug in the Auth-Lib repo.

2. Publish version 1.2.1.

3. Go to the User-Service repo. Update dependency. Run tests. Deploy.

4. Go to the Billing-Service repo. Update dependency. Run tests. Deploy.

5. Go to the Notification-Service repo...

You see the friction? You are manually propagating state across the system. It is slow. It is prone to human error. It creates “Dependency Hell.” Service A is on v1.0. Service B is on v2.0. They try to talk. They crash.

The Monorepo Fix:

1. You change the code in the shared folder.

2. You commit.

That’s it. Everyone is on the “HEAD” version. Always. There is no versioning drift. There is no lag. If you break a consumer, the build fails immediately. You know it before you merge.

This is Atomic Consistency. It turns a week-long coordination effort into a single unit of work.

Atomic Refactoring

Refactoring is the maintenance of the machine.

If you cannot refactor easily, your code rots. It creates rust. In a microservices environment, changing a core API signature is a political event. You have to send emails. You have to schedule “deprecation windows.” You have to support backward compatibility for months.

In a Monorepo, it is a single atomic commit. You change the API. You update all the callers in the same Pull Request. The compiler checks the entire universe of your code. If it compiles, it works.

This gives you Velocity. Real velocity. Not the illusion of speed you get from ignoring dependencies, but the actual speed of moving the entire fleet forward simultaneously.

Unified Infrastructure

When you fracture your repos, you fracture your culture. Team A uses ESLint. Team B uses Prettier. Team A deploys with Jenkins. Team B uses GitHub Actions. Team A writes Unit Tests. Team B “doesn’t believe in testing.”

Entropy sets in.

The standards diverge.

Moving an engineer from Team A to Team B requires weeks of onboarding because the “shape” of the work is different.

In a Monorepo, the infrastructure is shared. You build the pipeline once. You optimize the build script once. Every optimization leverages across the entire organization. If you make the linter faster, 500 engineers save time instantly. This is High-Leverage Engineering.

Look at the pipeline. In a Monorepo, this pipeline is a fortress gate. Nothing gets in unless it integrates with everything. It forces discipline. It forces the system to remain coherent.

Part III: The Nuance of Data

I hear the dissenters:

“But Matt, the database! The database cannot scale!”

They are half-right. The application layer can be monolithic. The code can be monolithic. But the Data Layer has physical limits.

If you try to run a Fortune 500 company on a single Postgres instance, you will hit a wall. Physics applies here. Disk I/O has limits. CPU cycles have limits.

The Problem:

1. Single Point of Failure: If the Mega-DB dies, the business dies.

2. The Noisy Neighbor: The analytics team runs a massive query to calculate monthly churn. It locks the user table. The checkout page freezes. You lose money.

The Solution: You do not need to shatter your codebase to solve this. You keep the Monolithic Codebase, but you implement Storage Segmentation.

You use Read Replicas.

You use Sharding. You use distinct schemas for distinct domains, even if they live on the same cluster.

You decouple the runtime data execution without decoupling the development-time logic. Do not confuse the Architecture of the Code with the Topology of the Database. They are different vectors. One is about Developer Velocity (Code). The other is about System Availability (Data).

Optimize the Code for Humans and AI. Optimize the Data for the Machine.

Part IV: The AI Catalyst

This is the pivot point. Everything I have said so far was true five years ago. But today, it is existential.

We are entering the age of AI-Augmented Engineering. We are moving from “Human writing code” to “Human directing AI agents to write code.”

To understand why the Monolith wins here, you must understand how Large Language Models think.

The LLM is a prediction engine. It relies on Context. It needs to see the variables. It needs to see the definitions. It needs to see the patterns.

The Polyrepo Blindness: Imagine an AI agent trying to refactor a feature in a polyrepo environment. It looks at Service A. It sees a call to an external API. It does not know what that API does. It cannot see the code. It hallucinates a response. Or it stops and asks you for help. The context boundary of the repository cuts off the AI’s intelligence. It is lobotomized.

The Monorepo God-Mode: Now, imagine that same AI in a Monorepo. The context window is filled with the entire dependency graph. The AI can “read” the definition of the function in Library X, see how it is used in Service Y, and update the implementation in Service Z.

As context windows expand to 1 million, 10 million tokens and beyond, the Monorepo becomes a superpower. You will be able to load your entire architecture into the working memory of the AI.

You can ask the AI: “Find every instance of this deprecated pattern across the entire company and rewrite it to the new standard, ensuring no integration tests fail.”

In a polyrepo, this is an impossible task for an AI. It requires traversing network boundaries, cloning repos, managing permissions. It is too fragile. In a monorepo, this is a local operation.

Google knew this. Google stores billions of lines of code in a single repository called Piper. They have done this for years. Why? Because they realized that the ability to make sweeping, cross-cutting changes to the entire codebase was a competitive advantage. They were preparing for this moment. They had “Attention is All You Need” published out of Google. They engineered the TPU. Google has always been building toward AGI and the implications of AGI on building software.

The AI is the ultimate Architect. But an Architect cannot design a building if he is only allowed to see one room at a time. He needs the blueprints for the whole structure. The Monorepo is that blueprint.

Part V: The Strategy of Consolidation

So, what is your move? If you are currently sitting on a pile of fragmented microservices, you are bleeding out.

Your developers are tired. Your velocity is fake. Your AI tools are blinded.

I suggest you must execute a Strategic Consolidation.

I am not telling you to rewrite everything overnight. That is suicide. I am telling you to stop the bleeding.

1. Stop Creating New Repositories. Make it a hard rule. If a new service is needed, it goes into the Monorepo. If a new library is needed, it goes into the Monorepo.

Create a “Gravity Well.” Let the mass accumulate in one place.

2. Adopt Unified Tooling. Use tools designed for this. Turborepo. Nx. Bazel. These are the weapons of the modern age. They allow you to have a Monolith structure with the caching and speed of isolated builds. They give you the best of both worlds: The cohesion of a monolith. The build performance of microservices.

3. Kill the Silos. The cultural shift is harder than the technical one. You must destroy the concept of “My Code” vs “Your Code.” It is Our Code. It is The System.

If an engineer from the Frontend team sees a bug in the Backend API, they should have the power (and the courage) to fix it in the same PR. That is Agency. That is Ownership.

Part VI: The Sovereign Engineer

We are moving toward a future where a single engineer can do the work of ten. But only if that engineer is equipped with the right leverage.

If you shackle your engineers with distributed complexity, you are stealing their potential. You are forcing them to be network administrators instead of product builders.

“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” Leonardo Da Vinci

The Monolithic Codebase is not a regression. It is a simplification. It is a rejection of the unnecessary. It is a focus on the essential.

The economy is tightening. The easy money is gone. The era of “Resume Driven Development” where we built complex things just to sound smart is over.

Now, only one metric matters: ROI.

Return on Investment.

Return on Intelligence.

Return on Infrastructure.

The Monolith offers the highest ROI. It reduces drag. It maximizes AI effectiveness. It aligns the team.

Stop networking your code. Start compiling it.

Most people will ignore this. They will cling to their microservices because it makes them feel sophisticated and their fellow techies tell them what to believe. They will continue to drown in latency and coordination costs.

They will wonder why their AI efforts keep failing.

Let them. That is your advantage.

While they are debugging their network, you will be shipping product. While they are managing versions, you will be evolving the system.

Build the Fortress. Unify the Code. Dominate the Space.

Friends: in addition to the 17% discount for becoming annual paid members, we are excited to announce an additional 10% discount when paying with Bitcoin. Reach out to me, these discounts stack on top of each other!

Thank you for helping us accelerate Life in the Singularity by sharing.

I started Life in the Singularity in May 2023 to track all the accelerating changes in AI/ML, robotics, quantum computing and the rest of the technologies accelerating humanity forward into the future. I’m an investor in over a dozen technology companies and I needed a canvas to unfold and examine all the acceleration and breakthroughs across science and technology.

Our brilliant audience includes engineers and executives, incredible technologists, tons of investors, Fortune-500 board members and thousands of people who want to use technology to maximize the utility in their lives.

To help us continue our growth, would you please engage with this post and share us far and wide?! 🙏