Linear Thinkers vs. the Factorial Future

Meet Avi.

For months, Avi has been wrestling with a problem that was both esoteric and profound: teaching an AI to design better batteries.

Not just incrementally better, the way a spreadsheet-wielding MBA in a corporate lab might aim for a 3% gain in energy density per quarter. Avi was looking for a leap. He was feeding his cluster of machines the entire corpus of materials science, every paper on electrochemistry, every patent filed since Volta first stacked his zinc and copper discs.

Then, he let it run.

But he did something different.

He didn't just ask for a better lithium-ion design. That was a linear question for a linear world. Instead, he pitted two AIs against each other in a bizarre, digital cockfight. One, the "Creator" would design novel molecular structures for anodes and electrolytes. The other, the "Destroyer" trained on the unforgiving laws of physics and thermodynamics, would mercilessly probe these designs for flaws, trying to prove they couldn't work. It was a Generative Adversarial Network, but not for making deepfake videos of celebrities. This was a GAN for forging reality itself.

For weeks, the results were… well, exponential.

The designs got better, faster than any human team could manage.

The progress curve bent upwards, a beautiful, predictable hockey stick. The investors were happy. I should know. I am one of them.

But then, one Tuesday morning, something changed. Avi, slurping his coffee, noticed an anomaly. The Creator hadn't just modified an existing molecular family. It had proposed a crystalline structure using a boron-silicon lattice that looked like nothing anyone had ever seen. It was elegant, stable, and, according to the Destroyer's frantic, failed attempts to break it, shockingly efficient.

The logs showed the AI hadn't arrived at this through step-by-step improvement. It had combined principles from protein folding, crystalline metallurgy, and quantum tunneling… domains that a human specialist would never think to connect. No mind in existence can actually connect these fields.

No human mind, at least.

Avi stared at the screen, the lukewarm coffee forgotten.

He wasn't looking at a better battery. He was looking at the ignition sequence for a new world.

Mediocristan

The great con of the modern age, the central Platonicity that has infected every institution from the Federal Reserve to the Ivy League, is the belief in the Gaussian bell curve. I geeked out about this recently.

The expectation that events will cluster politely around the mean. The world of “Mediocristan” as a certain philosopher-trader might call it, where the tallest man in a room is not much taller than the average. Our entire society is built on this assumption. Our economic forecasts, our political strategies, our retirement plans—they are all instruments calibrated for a world of manageable deviations. They are designed by linear thinkers, the empty suits who chart the future by drawing a straight line from the past.

But we are not in Mediocristan anymore.

The work of people like Avi is a postcard from the new country: “Extremistan”.

This is the world of Black Swans, wild, fat-tailed distributions where one event, one discovery, can change everything.

The technologies we are building, particularly in artificial intelligence, are not just tools for optimizing the old world. They are engines for generating Black Swans. They are designed to explore the combinatorial explosion of the possible, the vast, dark territory where the truly novel resides.

The rate of progress is no longer exponential. Exponential growth, for all its drama, is still predictable. You can see the doubling coming. Factorial growth is a different beast entirely. It’s the difference between adding a grain of rice to a chessboard square and calculating the number of ways you can arrange the pieces. One is a matter of scale; the other is a leap into a new dimension of complexity and possibility.

The AI that designed Avi’s battery didn’t just get better; it got wider. It started connecting concepts across disconnected domains. This is the source of the factorial acceleration: the cross-pollination of ideas at a speed and scale that makes human collaboration look like continental drift.

And the bottleneck that was supposed to save the linear thinkers?

Data. For years, the refrain was that AI was limited by the data we could feed it. You want an AI to diagnose a rare cancer? You need a million examples of that cancer. But the GANs, the simulators, the synthetic data engines…they blew that limitation to smithereens. We no longer need to find the data; we can generate it. We can create perfectly tailored, impossibly vast datasets to train an AI on any problem imaginable. Data went from being the anchor to being the wind. A hurricane-force tailwind.

This convergence of so many technologies all hitting inflection points at the same time is what is causing all of this. New hardware architectures, generative software and infinite synthetic data swirling around faster and faster. It’s the quiet, tectonic shifting of plates beneath the feet of a society still arguing about last quarter’s GDP figures. And for those who are willing to look up from the well-trodden path, the opportunities that surface area will reveal will be staggering. This isn’t about a faster iPhone. This is about rewriting the operating system of civilization.

Let's walk this forward.

Let’s imagine the world that is bubbling up from the engineering teams and the distributed server farms of the world.

The Antifragile Body

For a century, medicine has been a game of averages.

A drug is approved if it works for the average person in a clinical trial. Dosing is based on weight and age, crude proxies for the beautiful, chaotic complexity of an individual’s biology. We treat the disease, not the person. It is a profoundly linear, profoundly fragile system. One bad reaction, one unforeseen side effect, and the patient breaks.

Now, imagine this: You wear a small, non-invasive patch on your arm. It doesn’t just track your heart rate and sleep. It samples interstitial fluid in real-time, monitoring thousands of biomarkers from hormones, proteins, cellular waste. This data feeds your “Digital Twin” a sophisticated AI model of you. Not a generic human, but a perfect, living simulation of your unique physiology, your genome, your microbiome.

Your Digital Twin runs millions of simulations a day. It’s your biological co-pilot. The interface isn’t a dashboard of confusing charts; it’s a conversation.

“Good morning,” your phone buzzes. “Your Twin notes a slight elevation in cortisol precursors and a dip in magnesium-transporter proteins. It projects a 70% probability of a tension headache this afternoon and reduced deep sleep tonight. Suggestion: A 20-minute walk before 10 AM, and consider adding spinach or almonds to your lunch. I’ve also formulated a personalized supplement, containing 150mg of a novel magnesium chelate the system designed yesterday, that should correct the pathway. A single dose can be printed at your local pharmacy kiosk.”

This isn't just prevention at this level. It's proactive biological engineering. It’s making the human body antifragile. We are gaining from stressors and information. When a new pathogen emerges, a global network of Digital Twins will simulate its effect on billions of unique biologies simultaneously. Within hours, not years, we would have not one vaccine, but thousands of personalized variants, optimized for different immune profiles.

And for diseases that already exist? The factorial engine will churn through the entire space of possible chemistry. Designing a molecule to bind to a specific cancerous protein will no longer be a decade-long, billion-dollar crapshoot. It will be a computational problem solved in an afternoon. Rare genetic diseases, the cruel accidents of inheritance that affect one in a million, will each get their own bespoke therapy, designed by an AI that can devote the entirety of its cognitive power to that one child.

The economics of scarcity that govern medicine will evaporate.

The End of Scarcity

Every economist, every politician, every human conflict is, at its root, a negotiation with scarcity. Not enough food, not enough energy, not enough clean water, not enough housing. We have built entire global systems around the management of these limitations.

This is the world the linear thinkers know.

The factorial engine we are building will render that world obsolete.

Consider materials. Avi’s battery was just the beginning. Imagine AIs set loose on the entire periodic table, on the infinite configurations of matter. We will design materials with properties that sound like magic. Room-temperature superconductors that will make energy transmission lossless, revolutionizing the grid and making technologies like maglev trains trivial. Self-healing concrete that repairs its own cracks, extending the life of infrastructure for centuries. Fabrics that are also solar panels, turning every piece of clothing, every tent, every building surface into a power source.

Energy itself becomes a problem of design, not extraction.

The immense, complex physics of nuclear fusion, with its turbulent plasmas hotter than the sun, is a perfect playground for a factorial AI. While human physicists tweak one variable at a time, an AI can simulate billions of magnetic confinement geometries at once, learning from each failure in microseconds. It won't be a single "breakthrough" that solves fusion, but a continuous, accelerating cascade of improvements.

Energy will become too cheap to meter by 2035. Bookmark this is you don’t believe me.

Desalination plants will turn deserts green. Vertical farms in every neighborhood, optimized by AIs for nutrient density and yield, will provide abundant, fresh food, ending the long, fragile supply chains that define our current system.

This isn't a utopian fantasy. It's the logical endpoint of turning creativity into a computational task. Scarcity is a function of our limited imagination in manipulating matter and energy. We are about to get an infinite imagination partner.

The Liberation of the Mind

The greatest fear of the linear thinker is, “The robots will take our jobs.”

I’m so bored of hearing about how AI is going to replace workers. Those people lack imagination and have fear to show for it.

It is a fear born of a mechanistic view of humanity, where our value is tied to our function in a corporate machine. It is, to be blunt, a category error. The factorial revolution is not about replacing human cogs. It is about smashing the machine and liberating the humans trapped inside.

The true impact of this new age will be the radical democratization of genius. Today, expertise is a fortress, guarded by years of specialized training and arcane jargon.

Tomorrow, everyone will have an oracle in their pocket.

What, then, is left for us to do?

Everything that matters.

The linear jobs we work in now, the shuffling of papers, the optimization of spreadsheets, the rote execution of known processes, will vanish.

They will be automated into triviality. This will be painful for those who have built their identities around such work, the same way the invention of the engine was painful for the horse-breeder.

But it will free humanity to focus on the things AIs can't do. AIs can explore a solution space, but they cannot feel the human problem that defines it. They can generate a million symphonies, but they cannot be moved to tears by one. They can answer any question, but they cannot feel the burning curiosity that asks it in the first place.

Our future work will be the work of the explorer, the artist, the ethicist, the caregiver, the philosopher, the community-builder. It will be the work of asking better questions, of defining more interesting problems, of connecting with each other on a deeper human level.

We will be liberated from the drudgery of the how and freed to focus on the power of the why.

The transition will be, to borrow everyone’s favorite word this summer, messy.

It will be terrifying to the incumbents.

The institutions built for the linear world: slow-moving governments, credential-obsessed universities, quarterly-report-driven corporations… they will creak, groan, and in many cases, shatter.

They are fragile systems, optimized for a predictable past, and they will be run over by a factorial future.

There will be resistance. The modern Luddites won't be smashing looms; they'll be calling for regulations to "slow down" AI, to preserve the comfortable, predictable world they understand. They will be trying to legislate the tide.

But the defining characteristic of this new world will be its antifragility. It will be a world that learns from shocks and gets stronger. A decentralized energy grid is harder to knock out than a centralized one. A population with personalized medicine is more resilient to pandemics. An economy of empowered individuals is more dynamic and adaptable than one dominated by lumbering giants.

The linear thinkers are expecting the future to rhyme with the past. They are preparing for a slightly faster version of today. They are listening for rhymes while the world is switching to a new language entirely. The surface area of the impossible is opening up, and with it, opportunities that we, with our linear brains, can barely begin to comprehend.

Avi, in his workshop, didn't just design a battery.

He uncorked the genie.

And while the timid will see a monster, those with nerve will see a servant of unimaginable power. The biggest risk we face is not the speed of the change. The biggest risk is a failure of imagination. It's clinging to the lamppost of the past while a new sun is rising. The future belongs not to the planners and the forecasters, but to the tinkerers, the curious, and the brave. Those willing to step onto that impossible new ground and start building.

I am talking about the factorial builders NOT the linear thinkers.

The linear thinker is a high priest of the rearview mirror.

He is the corporate strategist with his five-year plans, the central banker with his inflation targets, the risk manager with his Value-at-Risk models that so famously failed to see any risk. He inhabits a world of tidy progressions, he’s the Man in Mediocristan where the most surprising event is the coffee machine running out of oat milk. His entire intellectual apparatus is built on one fragile, comforting, and catastrophically wrong assumption: that the future will rhyme with the past. He plots the next data point by placing a ruler on the last two.

This is the thinking of the turkey, fattened for a thousand days, concluding with mounting statistical confidence that the butcher is his friend. It is a strategy that works perfectly, right up until the moment it becomes lethally stupid. Society is filled with these well-fed turkeys, all congratulating each other on the predictability of their world, all blind to the approaching Thanksgiving of technological disruption.

They are preparing for an exponential future, but they’ve misread the math. Exponential growth, a doubling, is still a rhyme. It’s predictable. You can see the next curve coming. What we are facing is not exponential. It is factorial.

Think of it this way: A linear thinker tries to build a taller ladder to pick more apples from the same tree. The exponential thinker builds a drone that harvests the apples autonomously. The factorial thinker builds a vertically integrated series of shipping containers filled with artificial sunlight, apple trees, hydroponics, custom designed fertilizers and an advanced AI to monitor it all, including robotic picking.

The factorial future is born from combinatorial explosion.

It’s the result of AI’s ability to connect disparate fields of knowledge in a way no human team ever could.

It’s not just about finding the answer faster; it’s about discovering entirely new questions. The number of possible combinations doesn’t just grow; it explodes into a universe of possibilities so vast it renders our old maps useless.

This shift is driven by the death of the data bottleneck. We no longer need to passively observe the world to learn; we can generate infinite, bespoke realities in simulation to teach our AIs. We have weaponized creativity, turned it into a brute-force computational problem.

The linear thinker, bless his heart, is preparing for a faster horse. He is forecasting the future of the candle-making industry the year before the invention of the lightbulb. His models, his projections, his entire worldview, are not just wrong, they are irrelevant.

He is building a stronger castle wall while the enemy is inventing air power.

The future isn't coming to rhyme with the past.

It’s coming to change our reality.

Friends: in addition to the 17% discount for becoming annual paid members, we are excited to announce an additional 10% discount when paying with Bitcoin. Reach out to me, these discounts stack on top of each other!

Thank you for helping us accelerate Life in the Singularity by sharing.

I started Life in the Singularity in May 2023 to track all the accelerating changes in AI/ML, robotics, quantum computing and the rest of the technologies accelerating humanity forward into the future. I’m an investor in over a dozen technology companies and I needed a canvas to unfold and examine all the acceleration and breakthroughs across science and technology.

Our brilliant audience includes engineers and executives, incredible technologists, tons of investors, Fortune-500 board members and thousands of people who want to use technology to maximize the utility in their lives.

To help us continue our growth, would you please engage with this post and share us far and wide?! 🙏